4000 posts
Re: 4000 posts
You're only saying that because you're so far behind.
- Thundershot
- Lethargic Dynamism
- Posts: 5673
- Joined: 29 Nov 2008 17:15
- Location: Confusedonshire
Re: 4000 posts
Quality may be over quantity, but quantity has a quality all of its own.
More news, as its made, from new Action Force!
Re: 4000 posts
that's practically Zen, T'shot
- gung-hoeddie
- Purveyor of fine trifle
- Posts: 5156
- Joined: 06 Dec 2008 11:51
- Location: by the sea side
Re: 4000 posts
It's certainly an interesting theory, but quantity will only create greed.
CIA got you pushing to many pencils.
Re: 4000 posts
No Zen, the Baron is just a c*nt. 

Re: 4000 posts
f*cking A.
- Thundershot
- Lethargic Dynamism
- Posts: 5673
- Joined: 29 Nov 2008 17:15
- Location: Confusedonshire
Re: 4000 posts
I seem to remember a military expert saying it was a Russian saying...many years since I saw the programme, so I may of misquoted it a little.
Any ways, this guy said it expressed Soviet tank warfare tactics during W.W.2, O.K. so the German tanks may of been technically superior & have a higher kill ratio per tank, but the U.S.S.R produced so many T34's that they overwhelmed the enemy with sheer numbers.
Any ways, this guy said it expressed Soviet tank warfare tactics during W.W.2, O.K. so the German tanks may of been technically superior & have a higher kill ratio per tank, but the U.S.S.R produced so many T34's that they overwhelmed the enemy with sheer numbers.
More news, as its made, from new Action Force!
Re: 4000 posts
that was basically Soviet military doctrine all over. don't build something really fancy, build something reliable, build a sh*t load and rely on numbers.
of course, if you've got better tactics or better technology to defeat superior numbers it don't mean sh*t.
i mean, 100,000 tanks are all very well, but if the US Air Force could use a half dozen F-117s to bomb the main bridges into West Germany, 100,000 tanks suddenly can't go any where and become sitting ducks...
of course, if you've got better tactics or better technology to defeat superior numbers it don't mean sh*t.
i mean, 100,000 tanks are all very well, but if the US Air Force could use a half dozen F-117s to bomb the main bridges into West Germany, 100,000 tanks suddenly can't go any where and become sitting ducks...
Re: 4000 posts
They wouldn't be using F - 117's they were retired in April 08.
When confronted by a difficult problem you can solve it more easily by reducing it to the question. How would the Lone Ranger handle this?
Re: 4000 posts
i meant in a 1980s WWIII scenario.
notice my use of 'Soviet' and 'West Germany'. both ceased to exist by 1991.
notice my use of 'Soviet' and 'West Germany'. both ceased to exist by 1991.