Star Trek: Sund's review SPOILERS!

For all the conversation that has nothing to do with anything!
Post Reply
User avatar
Sundance
Friendly Dragonfly Inbound
Friendly Dragonfly Inbound
Posts: 5037
Joined: 20 Jan 2009 11:14

Star Trek: Sund's review SPOILERS!

Post by Sundance »

Pine was good as Kirk, Quinto was good as Spock. I also liked Pegg and Urban. Don't really think Cho got much to do. Seldana was good as Uhura. Yelchin's cod Russian accent was even more daft than Koenig's which is laughable since he is Russian.

Storywise, i thought it was okay. Not great. but not terrible. The science was terrible. All that black-hole time-travel bull was even more rediculous than some of the technobabble people slam VGR and TNG for. And a super-nova that threatens the whole galaxy? :lol::lol::lol: beyond stupid.

I still hate the fugly ship. And i REALLY hated the engineering decks on the Kelvin and the E. it looked more like a pumping plant or power-station than a starship. they seem far too huge for the size of the ship.

Lens-flares. Yeesh. Seriously, what the hell was with that?

somehow it seemed forced that everyone wound up on the E the way they did. maybe it was because of Uhura's determination to be on the E, but somehow it just seemed laboured.

overall, i'm giving it a 7/10


turns out, Engineering was filmed at a Bud brewery in Van Nuys. this explains much.

User avatar
Thundershot
Lethargic Dynamism
Lethargic Dynamism
Posts: 5673
Joined: 29 Nov 2008 17:15
Location: Confusedonshire

Re: Star Trek: Sund's review SPOILERS!

Post by Thundershot »

More news, as its made, from new Action Force!

Post Reply

Return to “Chat”