Page 1 of 2

COLTON VS VAUGHN

Posted: 08 Feb 2007 11:28
by jamarmiller
So what does everyone think of the leader of GI JOE - GI JOE, having had worked with Vaughn the leader of the red shadows in the DDP book

Personally I think its comic gold , all of the sudden I am super interested in Joseph Coltons past and Vaughns as well

While others didnt like the RED SHADOWS storyline I LOVED IT,

I think the Red Shadows has so much potential and because of that connection now Joseph Colton does too

course I would have loved to see

Vaugh referred to as the Baron Iron Blood
and

Kulik referred to the RED JACKAL ( both are from the former USSR , both are the strong guys of the group ) but I am still quite interested in the Joseph Colton character where I was never before

any thoughts?

Posted: 11 Feb 2007 21:17
by Quickfire
Whilst I don't really follow all of this, I feel honour bound to point out that a Dep Sec Gen of NATO is called John Colston.

Der-ner-ner-ner-Der-ner-ner-ner

Wilkommen ins die fgn AF twilight zone y'all

:quick:

Posted: 12 Feb 2007 15:00
by The Baron
Now here's a thought. I cannot post scans of the DDP comics at BFTB as they are still under licence, and a t the same time the majority of the board here need to read that story.

Does anyone know what the legal ramifications would be if I posted scans of the comic with the characters renamed to fit this continuity?

Posted: 12 Feb 2007 15:04
by jamarmiller
that would be really cool to see but I did something similar to that a while back and got a nice note from the company saying saying to stop


but I agree everyone on this board needs to read that story and get behind that story, the more sales they make on it , the more likely we will see more of the red shadows and even possibley something more in tune with the old shadows we know and love from this site

Posted: 12 Feb 2007 21:07
by Quickfire
Er.. you guyz never heard of greendeezel?

He'll give you a laxative for your eternity troubles. In an instant!

:quick:

PS. My errant disclaimer can be extenuated from the US Safe Harbor Statutes. And the fifth amendment if really so very necessary. This is but merely a statement of fact based on established multi-jurisdictional precedents.

Posted: 12 Feb 2007 21:14
by The Baron
:shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow:

Posted: 12 Feb 2007 21:48
by Quickfire
The Baron wrote::shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow: :shadow:
Yeah. Been there before. Seen it. Slotted it. Done it. Now where was that nuked thread exactly?

:quick:

PS. Hope you got fgn medieval on Greendeezel's sorry cd-empowered mtrfgn ass.

PPS. Where the fugg is Greendeezel? Thought he was a fgn dis-member(ed)?

Posted: 12 Feb 2007 22:55
by The Baron
http://www.bloodforthebaron.com/phpbb2/ ... php?t=1019

Although an all-new Muton Emoticon adventure may flesh out the Muton forum...

:muton: I... <bzzt> Function!!

Posted: 13 Feb 2007 02:03
by Quickfire
The Baron wrote:http://www.bloodforthebaron.com/phpbb2/ ... php?t=1019

Although an all-new Muton Emoticon adventure may flesh out the Muton forum...

:muton: I... <bzzt> Function!!
er, yeah, it might indeed, but this is so much more in the spirit of the other thread referring to SMERSH, I mean SMASH!

Nice catch, nevertheless, and it may, indeed, re-envigour elecron and positron aspects of the Muton transportation in wotever incantation is currently dual-core given....

:kraken: "First we chop them up"
:skeletron: "Then we cook them"
:jackal: "After smashing them into sma-zhing beets"
:muton: "Then we shmersh them some more"
:skeletron: "Zen zvee smash dem up agin"
:jackal: "Into leetle beetz"
:baron2: "Zen we coook zem up"

Or wotever. I must admit, the verisimillitude of the Smash adverts and threads, forsaken me it has...

:skeletron: "Fookin maroon, gannin oot on za toon bai da Tin man; oor forkin wot ya bastud?"

I think we should all buy some more toys. By the Tyne. Or anywhere but here. And definitely NOT on fkn EBay-shadmotherfuckinoutbidyabastidaydeed.con

:quick:

Posted: 28 Jun 2007 02:17
by jamarmiller
I am so hoping to see a Vaughn and Colton re-match with the red shadows full bore again soon in the pages of WWIII