Weird but true, like how the Beatles take Apple Computers to court everytime they add something to iTunes as Apple Corp (the Beatles) trademarked Apple for music and films and so on and Apple Computers have moved into that territory but don't have the trademark rights to use the Apple (Computers) brand for music, etc.SteveD wrote: Trade marks is a weird area of law. It's like two different "levels". One, is just if you're using it, and it's synonymous with your product, you can claim it as your trade mark, and try to stop others using it. That's when people put "tm" after stuff. S better level of protection is afforded by applying to have a trade mark registered. If granted you are granted it in certain areas you apply for, such as, say, toys. That's when you get an "r" or "reg tm" after stuff. Most companies protect their tm by registering these days. So, say, you couldn't register "action force" as a reg tm in toys - already taken, but you might be able to register action force as a tm in, say, medicine! Bizarre, I know!
JOECON 2010-- RED SHADOWS ? ACTION FORCE ????
- action-figure-supplies
- Cobra
- Posts: 830
- Joined: 09 Apr 2005 15:28
- Location: United Kingdom
- Contact:
Re: JOECON 2010-- RED SHADOWS ? ACTION FORCE ????
Re: JOECON 2010-- RED SHADOWS ? ACTION FORCE ????

Amarican Red Shadows officer
Re: JOECON 2010-- RED SHADOWS ? ACTION FORCE ????
So, as I have been promoting the Action Force line and using the logos for the last seven years, does this mean that I now own the IP?
Re: JOECON 2010-- RED SHADOWS ? ACTION FORCE ????
No, that only means you have been lucky enough not to be locked up in jail yet! 

Fully agree!jamarmiller wrote:that's a pretty cool weapon now that the magazine is removable
Re: JOECON 2010-- RED SHADOWS ? ACTION FORCE ????
No sorry Jamar its still sh*t removable mag or not."all things considered thought, that's a pretty cool weapon now that the magazine is removable"
My wants: http://bloodforthebaron.com/phpBB3/view ... f=3&t=9258My Accessory wants: viewtopic.php?f=3&t=8651
- The Kraken Wakes
- SCREEEEEEE!
- Posts: 5275
- Joined: 28 Apr 2007 16:40
- Location: Nottingham
Re: JOECON 2010-- RED SHADOWS ? ACTION FORCE ????
its too bloody big...
twitter - @thekrakenwakes / @BIronblood
instagram - THE_KRAKEN_WAKES
instagram - THE_KRAKEN_WAKES
Re: JOECON 2010-- RED SHADOWS ? ACTION FORCE ????
The figure is a very good modernisation of the original and I really like it but it just seems no thought was applied to weapon. Alot of Joes weapons are pretty naff but this is one of the naffest!
My wants: http://bloodforthebaron.com/phpBB3/view ... f=3&t=9258My Accessory wants: viewtopic.php?f=3&t=8651
Re: JOECON 2010-- RED SHADOWS ? ACTION FORCE ????
Doesn't bother me at all, I always thought the original bazooka was rubbish. All of my figures are kitted out with Marauders AK47s.
Re: JOECON 2010-- RED SHADOWS ? ACTION FORCE ????
Shads should carry some form of Kalashnikov, I agree. whether it's the old -47, the middle -74 or the newer -103...
Re: JOECON 2010-- RED SHADOWS ? ACTION FORCE ????
Must admit I always did think that the bazookas were a bizarre choice to have as their sole weapon. This new weapon though reminds me of something you might see someone injecting cavity wall insulation with!
Totally unrealistic and like I said it has the could'nt be arsed factor!

My wants: http://bloodforthebaron.com/phpBB3/view ... f=3&t=9258My Accessory wants: viewtopic.php?f=3&t=8651